Hosted by TruLight Ministries International – The Place of Truth
SELECT YOUR READING LANGUAGE – BOTTOM LEFT = YOUR DAILY MANNA NOW AVAILABLE IN 103 LANGUAGES
@ TruLight Daily Manna is not Just a Bible Verse with a Small Prayer . NO ::: WE SERVE DAILY Manna for the ENTIRE Day . Breakfast , Lunch , Dinner , Plus tea Times and even Entertainment Manna . Plus News Manna and More , This Daily Manna will keep you Spiritually full for the full 48 Hours and even More to Share with your Friends and Family !!!
Don’t Imagen God’s answers on Your Prayers !!!
Psalm 95:6 says, “Come, let us worship and bow down, Let us kneel before the LORD our Maker.” Bowing and kneeling have long been associated with worship and reverence (see 2 Chronicles 6:13; Psalm 138:2; Daniel 6:10). In fact, the Hebrew word for “worship” actually means “bow down.” But is bowing or kneeling the only posture we are to take in worshiping or praying?
The first instance recorded in the Bible of bowing in reverence is in Genesis 18:2 when the three heavenly visitors came to Abraham. He knew they represented God, and he bowed to the ground in welcome. A few generations later, Pharaoh, king of Egypt, ordered all Egyptians to bow to Joseph as a sign of respect for the former slave promoted to second-in-command (Genesis 41:42–43). So, very early in human history, bowing or kneeling came to represent taking a humble position before someone of greater importance.
Bowing and kneeling before rulers and false gods had become commonplace by the time God gave the Law to Moses. God wanted to set some new boundaries about the worship owed to Him. The second commandment says, “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything. . . . You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God” (Exodus 20:4–5). God reserves any form of worship for Himself, and bowing down before someone or something else as a form of worship is forbidden. In Revelation 19:10, John falls at the feet of the angel who was explaining a vision to him, but the angel immediately corrects him: “Don’t do that! I am a fellow servant with you and with your brothers and sisters who hold to the testimony of Jesus. Worship God!”
Bowing and kneeling were not the only postures adopted by worshipers in the Bible. Moses and Aaron fell facedown before the Lord, and His glory overshadowed them (Numbers 20:6). Ezekiel fell facedown in grief, crying out to the Lord, and the Lord answered him (Ezekiel 11:13–14). The Levites were to “stand every morning to thank and praise the LORD. They were to do the same in the evening” (1 Chronicles 23:30). King David “went in and sat before the Lord” to pray (2 Samuel 7:18). Jesus “lifted His eyes toward heaven” when He offered His longest recorded prayer (John 17), and Paul exhorted “men everywhere to pray, lifting up holy hands without anger or disputing” (1 Timothy 2:8). According to the Bible, there is more than one right posture for worship or prayer.
While physical representations of worship are important, and our entire being should be engaged in worship of God, the posture of our hearts is of more importance than the position of our bodies. When the posture of our hearts is humility and awe, our bodies often yearn to express that in physical ways. Kneeling, bowing, lying facedown, bowing our heads, and lifting our hands are all physical expressions of the attitudes of our hearts. Of course, without a corresponding heart posture, the physical actions are empty showmanship. Psalm 51:17 eloquently summarizes God’s desire for our worship: “The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; A broken and a contrite heart, O God, You will not despise.”
True worship is a lifestyle, not an activity. While dedicated times of intense communion with God are vital to our spiritual health, we are also told to “pray without ceasing” (1 Thessalonians 5:17). Our bodies are to be living sacrifices (Romans 12:1–2) and our hearts filled with “psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody with your heart to the Lord; always giving thanks for all things in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ to God, even the Father” (Ephesians 5:19–20). Our hearts can be in a continual state of worship and prayer, even as we go about our days. A. W. Tozer wrote, “The goal of every Christian should be to live in a state of unbroken worship.” When that is the goal of our lives, kneeling, bowing, lying prostrate, and walking down the street are all postures of prayer and worship that are pleasing to God.
Tea Time Manna
Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says.
—James 1:22
What we know and what we believe are not all that significant if they do not show up in the way we live our daily lives. Unfortunately, most of us know more truth than we obey. Pure and simple, faith not lived out in everyday life is not genuine faith; it is a facade (James 2:14-15, 17, 18, 20). Just as Jesus had told us to put into practice what we have learned from him (Matthew 7:23-27), his brother James reminds us of the same thing: when we learn the truth of God’s word, there is only one thing left for us to do: obey it and put it into practice!
Prayer
Holy God, please help us put into practice what we know to be your will for us and the truth you have given to us. And please, dear Lord, help us do it with passion today, and to do it day after day, until we come into your presence in glory. In the name of the Lord Jesus, I pray. Amen and Amen
Bible Teaching of the Day
LUNCH MANNA =
Many people believe answered prayer is God granting a prayer request that is offered to Him. If a prayer request is not granted, it is understood as an “unanswered” prayer. However, this is an incorrect understanding of prayer. God answers every prayer that is lifted to Him. Sometimes God answers “no” or “wait.” God only promises to grant our prayers when we ask according to His will. “This is the confidence we have in approaching God: that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us. And if we know that he hears us—whatever we ask—we know that we have what we asked of him” (1 John 5:14-15).
What does it mean to pray according to God’s will? Praying according to God’s will is praying for things that honor and glorify God and/or praying for what the Bible clearly reveals God’s will to be. If we pray for something that is not honoring to God or not God’s will for our lives, God will not give what we ask for. How can we know what God’s will is? God promises to give us wisdom when we ask for it. James 1:5 proclaims, “If any of you lacks wisdom, he should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to him.” A good place to start is 1 Thessalonians 5:12-24, which outlines many things that are God’s will for us. The better we understand God’s Word, the better we will know what to pray for (John 15:7). The better we know what to pray for, the more often God will answer “yes” to our requests.
DINNER TIME MANNA
The concept of “putting out a fleece” comes from the story of Gideon, a leader in Israel, in Judges 6. When God directed him to gather the Israelite troops to defeat the Midianite invaders, Gideon wanted to be sure it was really God’s voice he was hearing and that he understood His directions. He asked God for a sign to prove that this was truly His will. So he put out a piece of wool overnight and asked God to make it wet while keeping the surrounding dirt dry. God graciously did as Gideon asked, and in the morning the fleece was wet enough to produce a bowl of water when it was wrung out.
But Gideon’s faith was so weak that he asked God for another sign—this time to keep another fleece dry while making the surrounding dirt wet. Again, God complied, and Gideon was finally convinced that God meant what He said and that the nation of Israel would have the victory the angel of the Lord had promised in Judges 6:14-16. Putting out the fleeces was the second time Gideon had asked for a sign that God was really talking to him and would do what He said He would.
There are several lessons for us in Gideon’s story. First, God is incredibly gracious and patient with us, especially when our faith is weak. Gideon knew he was treading on dangerous ground and was trying God’s patience by asking for multiple signs. After the first fleece sign, he said, “Do not be angry with me. Let me make one more request” (Judges 6:39). But our God is a merciful, loving and patient God who knows our weaknesses. However, the story of Gideon should be for our instruction and not serve as a model for our own behavior. Jesus said on two occasions that “a wicked and adulterous generation seeks after a sign” (Matthew 12:39; 16:1-4). His point was that the signs He had already given them—His fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy, healings, and miracles—were sufficient for them to respond to the truth, if truth was what they were seeking. Clearly, it was not.
Another lesson of Gideon’s fleeces is that those asking for signs are exhibiting a weak and immature faith that won’t be convinced by the signs anyway! Gideon had received more than enough information without the sign of the fleeces. God had told him he would have victory (v. 14), and He had responded to a previous request for a sign with a miraculous display of power in fire (v. 16). Still, Gideon asked for two more signs because of his own insecurity. In the same way, even when God does provide the sign we ask for, it doesn’t give us what we crave because our wavering faith still doubts. That often leads us to ask for multiple signs, none of which give us the assurance we need, because the problem isn’t with God’s power; it’s with our own perception of it.
A problem with following Gideon’s example of fleece-setting is that it does not take into account that our situation and his are really not comparable. As Christians, we have two powerful tools that Gideon lacked. First, we have the complete Word of God which we know is “God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:16-17). God has assured us that His Word is all we need to be “thoroughly equipped” for anything and everything in life. We do not need experiential proof (signs, voices, miracles) to verify what He has already told us in His Word. Our second advantage over Gideon is that every Christian has the Holy Spirit, who is God Himself, residing in his heart to guide, direct, and encourage. Prior to Pentecost, believers had the Old Testament only and were directed externally by God’s providential hand. Now we have His complete Bible and His indwelling presence in our hearts.
Rather than seeking signs via fleeces, we should be content to know God’s will for us in every situation every day: “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly” (Colossians 3:16); “Be joyful always; pray continually; give thanks in all circumstances, for this is God’s will for you in Christ Jesus” (1 Thessalonians 5:16-18); “And whatever you do, whether in word or deed, do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him” (Colossians 3:17). If these things characterize our lives, the decisions we make will be in accordance with God’s will, He will bless us immeasurably with His peace and assurance, and there will be no need to put out fleeces or ask for signs.
NEWS MANNA –
The Strange Alliance Between Islam (Light Green Horse) And Socialism (Red Horse)
One of the things that is perplexing and often a topic of conversation is this new American-Western European alliance or absorption of Islam and Marxism-socialism-communism. In other words, people who identify as radical Muslims, often in their alliance, include people who are traditional Western Marxists, and it doesn’t seem possible for a variety of ways.
There’s a lot of antitheses. Do we really believe that these upscale people in blue enclaves in the United States who declare themselves socialist and are voting for people like Zohran Mamdani, or Ilhan Omar, or Rashida Tlaib, who are proud, and active, and often fervent Muslims, tolerate gays? Do you really believe if you said, “I am gay, and I’m proud of it, and I want to announce that in Saudi Arabia,” you wouldn’t be in trouble?
Do you really believe that if you went to Iran and said, “I want to repeal all the sodomy laws,” you wouldn’t be in trouble?
Or if you went, let’s say, to Egypt and you said, “I wanna have a trans, sexual support group,” you wouldn’t be in trouble? Do you really believe that upscale, independent women in Western cities, maybe unmarried, professional, doesn’t that bother them a little bit when they ally themselves with radical Muslims who tell them that, as far as men go, their dream is going to an Islamic heaven and having the sexual use as if they’re almost tools of 72 virgins?
Does that go well with a book editor in Manhattan or the head of an NGO in Denver? I don’t think so.
Another thing that’s quite different is Islam believes in Allah, and that’s it. All other people who are non-believers are doomed to hell, and the duty is to spread worship, loyalty, fealty to the Muslim Allah.
But throughout the history of socialism and Marxism and communism, all of them agree on one thing, that religion is really the opiate of the masses. They feel that class struggle is harmed or negated by people who believe in a God.
Another thing that’s very different is Marxists believe in the state control of the means of production, and socialists believe that this–there can be private property, but mostly the utilities, the railroads, the steel companies, most all of the muscles of a society are owned also by the state.
But they believe in a commission, a committee, a chairman. They don’t believe that one exercises power through royalty or succession, although most communist and Marxist states, which we see in North Korea and we see in Iran, they’re very similar in some ways. But, in the Arab world, monarchy is pretty much de rigueur, as we see in the Gulf states.
But Marxism says, “No, we don’t believe in kings. We overthrow them.” That was what the revolutions of 1848 were about. That’s what the French Revolution was about. That’s basically what the Bolsheviks were trying to get rid of an imperial dynastic tsar. So, that’s another antithesis.
Another thing is the Arab world is based on tribalism, that your first loyalty goes to people who look like you, speak a dialect of Arabic like you, and have a local or regional affinity, a proximity to you.
That’s always been the challenge of the modern Arab nation or state. How do you include people from seven, 10, 15, 20 different tribes who have fought each other for centuries and only come together when coerced to, for example, under the Ottoman Empire?
But Marxism is very different. Your first allegiance is not to people who look like you.
It’s to the global proletariat, the oppressed, the Comintern. Socialists believe that they have more in common with people in Europe who are fellow socialists than they do with rich people or, or people who are devoutly religious in their own country.
So tribalism is part of Islam’s foundation. Globalism is central to the socialist or the communist or the Marxist.
However, all of that said, someone’s going to say, “Well, Victor, they’re alike. They have a coalition. Zohran Mamdani is a hardcore Marxist, and he’s a hardcore Islamicist, and so is Ilhan Omar, and so are almost all the people in Dearborn, Michigan, it seems like, and so are these new socialist candidates that are popping up like flowers everywhere in blue cities and urban areas.”
So, what’s the similarities? One, they hate Western civilization. They can’t stand the values of Western civilization, free speech, religious opportunity, market capitalism, etc. They both hate that and Islam has been, has been at war with the West since the seventh century, and it’s fought Westerners not just in the Crusades, but all through the history of the Byzantine Empire, all through the history of Europe and North Africa.
And when [Osama] bin Laden said the great tragedy was that Islam lost its hold in Europe, what he was basically talking about was the Battle of Tours and the stopping of the Islamic movement northward into Europe. They, of course, have, in the Quran and its related apocrypha, there’s a lot of hatred of Jews.
They hate Israel with a passion. So do Marxists, socialists. I’m not sure why they do, given the creation of Israel was based on a kibbutz system, which is socialistic in nature, and many of the original generation who settled in Israel even before World War II came there as dissidents from Eastern Europe and Russia, and they believed in a socialist future.
But that’s all ancient history now. As of now, what draws Muslims to the new left-wing hardcore socialist and communist, and what draws them to include rather antithetical Muslims into their movement, they hate Israel with a passion, and they hate Jews.
There’s another, similarity. They hate capitalism.
They do not believe that a person should have freedom of opportunity to start his own business, to make a profit. In the Islamic world, interest is frowned upon officially. Not that the Gulf states are run … The Gulf states are run on hypercapitalism, but officially they find, euphemisms and mechanisms to get around prohibitions in the Quran for hypercapitalism or laissez-faire capitalism.
And of course, capitalism is the main enemy of Zohran Mamdani and others who feel it’s unfair, it doesn’t share the wealth. They believe in the message not of the Americans, “Give me liberty or give me death,” a revolution to ensure political freedom, but a holistic, totalitarian, three-hundred-and-sixty-degree revolution of fraternity egalitarianism.
In other words, we’re not just going to give people freedom to speak. We don’t want them to have freedom to speak. We want to make them equal on the back end by the use of government coercion.
Both of them hate democracy then. They don’t like the people voting because, in the Arab world or the Muslim world, there will be people who object to the role of women, especially in the modern age, or the role that intolerance for sexual minorities or the intolerance shown Christians.
And so, they will object, and they wouldn’t want to express that objection. That’s taboo. And we know from the history of socialism, they say they believe in free speech, but very quickly socialists try to outlaw it, and when they become communists, they kill for it.
Trump’s Gaza Peace Breakthrough: A Warning When They Say Peace And Safety
President Donald Trump has now used one of the Bible’s most prophetically charged phrases twice in connection with his efforts to reshape the Middle East.
After announcing a preliminary agreement with Iran in June, Trump wrote, “This Great Deal will bring Peace and Security to the whole Region.” Regional hostilities subsequently resumed, demonstrating how quickly sweeping declarations of peace can outrun events on the ground.
Now Trump has announced what he calls a historic agreement for the complete disarmament of Hamas and every other armed group in Gaza.
“This is a monumental step toward lasting PEACE and SECURITY,” Trump declared.
For students of Bible prophecy, those words immediately recall the warning of 1 Thessalonians 5:3:
“For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them.”
That does not mean Trump’s agreement fulfills this passage. Christians should not force every peace initiative into a prophetic timetable. But Scripture repeatedly warns that the most dangerous moment may come when the world believes Israel’s enemies have finally been contained.
Has Hamas Really Agreed To Surrender?
Trump describes the agreement as a milestone in implementing his existing 20-point Gaza plan. Hamas and other terrorist groups would surrender their weapons in phases, Israel would withdraw as disarmament progresses, international forces would enter Gaza, and a technocratic Palestinian government would assume control.
Yet the details are less reassuring than the headline.
Hamas has made implementation conditional upon Israel fulfilling its obligations. Other accounts describe weapons being catalogued, stored or transferred to a Palestinian body rather than immediately destroyed under Israeli supervision.
There is a vast difference between destroying Hamas’s weapons and storing them. There is also a difference between dismantling Hamas and moving its fighters into a new Palestinian police force.
Hamas has floated a ten-year truce in which its weapons could be frozen while it retained what it calls the Palestinian “right to resist.”
That may not be disarmament.
It may be strategic patience.
Ten years would give Gaza time to rebuild. It could also give Hamas time to restore its influence inside schools, mosques, charities, political organizations and security institutions.
Can An Ideology Be Disarmed?
Even if every rocket and rifle were collected tomorrow, the ideology that produced October 7 would remain.
Hamas is not merely an army. It is an Islamist movement whose influence reaches into religion, education, media, social services and government.
Weapons can be confiscated. Tunnels can be demolished. Commanders can be eliminated.
But an ideology must be defeated.
Any new Palestinian administration would have to reject Hamas’s theology of violence, condemn the atrocities of October 7, remove terrorist indoctrination from schools and prevent Hamas operatives from controlling the police and civil service.
Otherwise, Hamas could disappear as an official government while remaining the power behind it.
That would not be peace.
It would be camouflage.
Who Is Guaranteeing Israel’s Security?
Trump credited Egypt, Qatar and Turkey with helping bring about the latest agreement.
Turkey refuses to classify Hamas as a terrorist organization. Qatar has hosted Hamas’s political leadership for years.
These governments may genuinely want the fighting to end. That does not mean their definition of peace matches Israel’s definition of security.
For them, peace may primarily mean an Israeli withdrawal, Palestinian political control and an end to Israeli military action.
For Israel, peace must mean that another October 7 can never happen.
This multinational structure also carries a striking prophetic parallel.
Daniel 9:27 says a coming ruler will “confirm a covenant with many” for one week, commonly understood by many prophecy scholars as a period of seven years.
The Hebrew wording translated “confirm” can carry the sense of making something strong, enforcing it or causing it to prevail. That leaves open an important possibility: the coming ruler may not necessarily create an entirely new treaty. He could strengthen, guarantee or impose an arrangement already in existence. Different translations render the expression as confirming, strengthening or making a firm covenant.
That is significant because Trump is not presenting the Hamas announcement as a completely new peace plan. He calls it a major milestone in implementing the 20-point framework that was already established.
This is not Daniel’s covenant as there are too many missing pieces.
But the pattern is instructive.
An existing agreement is elevated by a powerful leader, supported by numerous nations, protected by international forces and presented as the answer to Israel’s security crisis.
Revelation 17 adds another dimension. It describes ten kings who receive authority with the beast and then surrendertheir power and authority to him.
Many prophecy scholars connect this global ruler with the prince who confirms the covenant in Daniel 9.
Scripture does not explicitly say that the ten kings negotiate Daniel’s covenant. Nor is Trump’s present Board of Peace a ten-nation coalition. We should not manufacture a numerical fulfillment where one does not exist.
Nevertheless, the emerging architecture is remarkable: a central figure chairs an international body, national leaders lend their influence to the arrangement, and a previously negotiated framework is strengthened and implemented across the region.
It offers a plausible picture of how a future covenant “with many” could operate.
Israel Dwelling Securely
Ezekiel 38 describes Israel living securely before the great invasion associated with Gog and Magog.
The present agreement does not mean Ezekiel’s war is imminent. But it helps us imagine how the conditions could eventually arise.
Hamas is declared disarmed. International troops enter Gaza. Israeli soldiers withdraw. Foreign governments guarantee the agreement. Billions of dollars pour into reconstruction. World leaders announce that the threat has finally disappeared.
The danger is Israesl becomes convinced its enemies have been permanently contained.
October 7 demonstrated what can happen when deterrence, advanced technology and assumptions about an enemy’s intentions create a false sense of security.
Daniel 8:25 provides another sobering parallel. It describes a coming ruler who, in the King James wording, “by peace shall destroy many.”
His weapon is not only military force. It is deception operating under the appearance of security.
Jeremiah similarly warned of leaders crying, “Peace, peace,” when there was no peace. Ezekiel condemned false prophets who promised peace while covering a dangerously unstable wall with whitewash.
The biblical pattern is clear: peace built upon deception eventually collapses.
Peace Must Be Proven
Christians should welcome genuine peace. The end of Hamas’s brutal rule would benefit Israelis and Palestinians alike.
But biblical discernment requires recognizing the difference between peace and an intermission.
Every weapon must be destroyed. Every tunnel must be neutralized. Hamas fighters must not be absorbed into the new Palestinian police force. The new government must reject Hamas’s ideology, and Israel must retain the freedom to act when violations occur.
Most importantly, Hamas must not be allowed to survive under a new name or behind a civilian façade.
The most dangerous words in the Middle East may not be open threats of annihilation.
They may be assurances that the threat has disappeared.
TruLight TV : I am Blessed
This brand new Live Concert features Bradley Walker singing some great hymns and songs of faith. Plus, through never before seen interviews, you will get a glimpse into his inspiring story and unwavering heart of gratitude. Joined on the album version by musical icons Vince Gill, Alison Krauss, Ricky Skaggs, and more, Walker’s straightforward renditions remind us of the joys of the hymnal in that old country church.
Today on TruLight Radio XM
TruLight Radio XM 24/7
Program
GMT / UTC +2
Monday To Fridays
00:15 Words to Live By Testimonies
01.15 Science Scripture and Salvation
02.15 Ground Works
04.00 Gospel Concert of the Day
05.00 The Daren Streblow Comedy Show
5:55 It is Today devotional
6:00 Gaither Homecoming Morning Show
7:15 Discover the Word
8.15 Destined for Victory
8:55 Science Scripture and Salvation
9:00 Holy Spirit Hour – Normally Sermons
10:15 Hope of the Heart
11:15 Unshackled
11.45 Words to Live By
12:15 Truth for Life
13:15 Living on the Edge with Chip Ingram
14:15 Focus on the Family
15:00 Kids Hour
16:00 In Touch with Dr. Charles Stanley
16:30 Groundwork
17:15 Live in the Light
18:15 Renewing your Mind
19:00 Gaither Homecoming Show
20:15 Growing Hope
21:15 Adventures in Odyssey Radio Drama
21:45 Bible Reading
22:15 Night-sounds
23.00 Good Old Country Gospel / Rhema Gospel Express
VISIT THE WEBSITE
TruLight Ministry News – EXTRA MANNA
TruLight Ministries orders from God since 2012 . Teach Them , Comfort Them and Warn Them!
Healing Truths.
End Time Articles.
Share this Feeding of Manna with your Friends and Family. just click on the Social Media icon and share This Manna with your Friends and Family. just click on the Social Media icon and share !
